Skip to content
February 9, 2011 / Nate Harris

Bad Faith In Mind

Last week I wrote a post about Viko Elektrik Ve Elektronik Endüstrisi Sanayi Ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi v. UniqueBrandNames (WIPO Case No. D2010-1856). I noted the Panel’s reference to the requirement that a complainant, to be successful, must prove that the respondent had it “in mind” when registering the disputed domain name.

Gerald Levine at udrpcommentaries.com has elaborated a bit more on the “in mind” requirement, and it’s definitely worth reading.

Advertisements